Leasing News (Wednesday, November 25, 2020

Sums up Recent Virtual Conference with 2,200 Participants
   Thanksgiving Message to the SFNet Community
    By Richard Gumbrecht, CEO, SFNet
New Hires/Promotions in the Leasing Business
    and Related Industries
Leasing Industry Ads
    —Help Wanted
Channel Partners: October 2020: 20 Recent Transactions
    Business/FICO/TIB/Annual Revenues/Amount/Term
Researchers Show Tesla Model X Can Be Stolen in Minutes
    By Eduard Kovacs, Security Week
Brand your Leased Vehicles
    truckinginfo.com
California Cannabis Tax Revenues 3rd Q: $159.8 Million
   Since January 2018, total program revenue to date is $1.81 billion
Leasing Icon John Deane to Retire End of Year
    CEO, Chairman, Co-Founder Alta Group
Brilliance Financial Technology Launches DPX
    Next Generation Real Time Digital Pricing
      and Profitability Management for Banks
Thanksgiving edition: The Last Waltz/Pocahontas
  Soul Food/Spider-Man/Enough Said
    Netflix Seasonal Classics chosen by Fernando Croce
Mutt
    Fredericksburg, Virginia Adopt-a-Dog
Scott Wheeler Annual Survey for Originators of
    Commercial Equipment Leasing and Finance
News Briefs—
Biden chooses former Fed Chair Janet Yellen
    to be Treasury secretary
Will the COVID-19 pandemic kill
    Black Friday this year?
San Francisco’s empty hotels have little
     to celebrate during coming holidays
   
You May have Missed—
Verizon, T-Mobile dominate 5G conversation,
     AT&T lags

Broker/Funder/Industry Lists | Features (wrilter’s columns)
Top Ten Stories Chosen by Readers | Top Stories last six months

www.leasingcomplaints.com (Be Careful of Doing Business)
www.evergreenleasingnews.org
Leasing News Icon for Android Mobile Device


Sports Brief—-
California Nuts Brief—
“Gimme that Wine”
This Day in History
SuDoku
Daily Puzzle
GasBuddy
Weather, USA or specific area
Traffic Live—-

######## surrounding the article denotes it is a “press release,” it was not written by Leasing News nor has the information been verified. The source noted. When an article is signed by the writer, it is considered a “byline.” It reflects the opinion and research of the writer.

Beneath the Merger of PacWest and CapitalSource

Continuation of Branch Expansion & Loan Activity

According to a press release announcing the merger of: “PacWest and CapitalSource will merge in a transaction valued at approximately $2.3 billion. The combined company will be called PacWest Bancorp and the combined subsidiary bank will be called Pacific Western Bank. The CapitalSource national lending operation will continue to do business under the name CapitalSource as a division of Pacific Western Bank.

The ownership will be 45% PacWest, 55% CapitalSource. There is a termination provision in here with a 19.9% stock option. The board will consist of 8 people from PacWest and 5 people from CapitalSource. John Eggemeyer, current Chairman of Pacific Western, will be the Chairman with Matthew P. Wagner as CEO.

PacWest Bancorp was formerly known as First Community Bancorp., a Rancho Santa Fe-based bank holding company with $4.6 million in assets that merged First National Bank and Pacific Western National Bank, renaming them Pacific Western Bank, originally organized October 22,1999, and based in San Diego, California. First Community grew at the first of the year by buying Foothill Independent Bancorp, Harbor National Bank.

Today PacWest continues in the same mode, buying Security Pacific Bank, Los Angeles, 2008, Affinity Bank, Ventura, California 2009, Los Padres Bank, Solvang, California 2010, April 3, 2012, Celtic Capital Corporation, Santa Monica, California, First California Financial Group, Westlake Village, 2012, as well as Marquette Equipment Finance in January 3, 2012 changing its name to its own Pacific Western Equipment Finance on March 25, 2012.

http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/pacw#ixzz2aNIhxkOz

The website states :Through our subsidiaries, BFI Business Finance and Celtic Capital Corporation, and our divisions, First Community Financial and Pacific Western Equipment Finance, we also provide working capital financing and equipment leasing to growing companies located throughout the United States. To them you now can add CapitalSource.

Matthew P. Wagner is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Western Bank and CEO of PacWest Bancorp, the holding company for Pacific Western Bank. Prior to joining PacWest in 2000, Mr. Wagner was President and Chief Executive Officer of Western Bancorp from 1996 until 1999, when Western Bancorp was acquired by U.S. Bancorp. Prior to joining Western Bancorp in 1996, Mr. Wagner served as an executive vice president with U.S. Bancorp in Minneapolis, Minnesota, from 1990 to 1996, and as a senior vice president from 1985 to 1990.

In the conference call following the announcement, as recorded by SeekingAlpha, Wagner was remarked he didn’t want to get involved in a bank having tough loan growth: “Most of the community banks you are looking at today, you’ve got anywhere from a 40% to 70% loan-to-deposit ratio…You’ve got a big-buying portfolio that I don’t need. I am going to end up with a bunch of excess deposits.”

“”With CapitalSource and their superior loan-generation platform, I’ve got that now,” Wagner says. “If we buy a company with an under-leveraging balance sheet, I’ve got the ability to leverage that now into good, high-performing loans.”
http://seekingalpha.com/news-article/7122042-pacwest-bancocp-and-capitalsource-inc-agree-to-merge

While the merger is good in apparently all respects, it also adds to the branch locations of Pacific Western Bank. Look at the numbers:

FDIC.gov March 31,2013, Pacific Western had 991 full time employees at 89 offices (only duplicate cities appear to be two offices in Westlake Village). CapitalSource offices are not located in other locations which are in San Diego, 17 offices, San Francisco, 2 offices, San Luis Obispo, 7 offices, one in San Mateo County, 4 in Santa Barbara and 11 in Ventura County. Wagner stated in his conference many of PacWest customers were age 60 and heavy into CD’s. Whether the marketplace or customer base is similar may depend on the location of the branch itself.

March 31, 2013 Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 14.51%

(in millions, unless otherwise)

Net Equity
2006 $1,308.3
2007 $1,312.0
2008 $494.8
2009 $584.9
2010 $570.1
2011 $625.5
2012 $649.6
3/13 $650.2

Profit
2006 $91.0
2007 $106.0
2008 -$715.1 (Pre-tax net operating income -685,873)
2009 $5.3
2010 -$52.3
2011 $58.0
2012 $61.2
3/13 $14.7

Non-Current Loans
2006 $22.1
2007 $22.5
2008 $63.5
2009 $240.1
2010 $151.5
2011 $124.8
2012 $82.0
3/13 $88.2

Charge Offs
2006 $1.4 ($1.2 commercial/industrial, $395,000 non-us address, $115, nonfarm/$29,000 construct,$22,000 other consumer)
2007 $2.8 ($1.8 commercial/ind.,$660,000 const./land,$454,000 nonfarm/nonres,$44 other consumer)
2008 $38.0 ( $24.9 const./land, $7.1 commercial/ind., $3.8 other consumer,$1.9 nonfarm/non res, $246,000 1-4 family homes)
2009 $86.4 ($40.2 nonfarm/nonres.,$28.1 const./land, $11.7 commercial, $983, individual, $12,000 other)
2010 $222.7 ( $99.3 nonfarm/nonres.,$30.3 const./land, $13.1 commercial/ind.,$9 multi-family, $5.9 other loans, $3.3 consumer, $99,000 farmland)
2011 $39.1 ($23.4 nonfarm/nonres., $6 other loans, $4.5 const./land,$$1.1 1-4 family, $61,000 consumer)
2012 $14.0 ($11.3 const./land, $2.6 commercial/ind., $692,000 1-4 family, $143,000 individuals)
3/13 $126,000 ($242,000 nonfarm/nonres.,$222,000 commercial industrial, $114,000 lease receivables
-$323,000 const./land, -$109,000 multi-family, -$14,000 individuals)

Construction and Land, 1-4 family multiple residential, Multiple Family Residential, Non-Farm Non-Residential loans.

(All bank numbers from FDIC.gov)

PacWest 2nd Quarter
http://leasingnews.org/archives/Jul2013/7_24.htm#pacwest

Why I Became a CLP

Krista L. Pressnall, CLP
Funding Coordinator II
Financial Pacific Leasing

Back in June 2006, I began my career at Financial Pacific Leasing, starting off as a Booking Coordinator. Within two years, I was promoted to Funding Coordinator Level I, and within two years I was promoted again to Funding Coordinator Level II, which is considered to be a lead position within the department.

Continue reading

Anger and the 80% Rule

Sales Makes it Happen by Steve Chriest

All of us have, at one time or another, encountered a lease customer or a co- worker who became angry as we negotiated with them about business or company matters. The most successful negotiators recognize the basis of anger and what to do when they encounter someone who is angry. I am going to pass on to you the “80% rule.”

First, it’s important to understand what drives people to anger. According to psychological studies, there are three primary causes of anger:

    • fear
    • hurt
    • frustration

People exhibit anger when they are afraid of something, when they are hurting for some reason, or when they are simply frustrated.

The customer who becomes angry because she cannot obtain the low, implicit interest rate that her boss asked her to secure from your company is not angry because of the higher interest rate. That’s just a number. The cause of her anger is most likely the fear she feels when she contemplates telling her boss she failed to secure the low interest rate he wanted.

If for some reason beyond your control you aren’t able to provide a service to a long-time customer, he or she may perceive your failure to help as a sign of themself and their company’s diminished importance to you and your company. Their feelings may be hurt in this process. These hurt feelings can manifest as anger directed toward you or your company.

Sometimes people express anger simply out of frustration. I’ve often observed that no one appears upset, irritated or really angry when things are going their way! When a client or co-worker faces one too many obstacles in a day, their increasing frustrations may result in a display of anger directed at anyone within shouting distance.

Although there are three primary drivers of anger, sometimes anger isn’t driven by fear, hurt or frustration. In some negotiations, like labor contract talks, anger is used by experienced negotiators as a favorite tactic to coerce, intimidate and threaten the other side. This manufactured anger has become part of the way the labor contract negotiation game is played.

Some leasing applicants use the same ploy to obtain a better deal.

Whatever the source of someone’s anger, it’s important to remember that your reaction determines, to a large degree, how the negotiation proceeds and ends. According to research done at the Harvard Negotiation Project, there is an 80% chance that you can influence, and even control the atmosphere and tone of a negotiation simply by mirroring the behavior you want from your negotiating partners.

If you find yourself negotiating with someone who is angry, or irritated, and you want to control the tone of the negotiation, don’t buy into their anger or frustration. Instead, remain calm, and listen carefully to what your negotiation partner says. At some point, in 80% of all cases, your negotiating partner will calm down and will begin to mirror your behavior. Very few people will argue with themselves or maintain anger when there is no reaction from the other side of the table!

In tough negotiations, remember the 80% rule. By definition, it doesn’t always work, but knowing that you have an 80% chance of controlling the tone and atmosphere in any negotiation, simply by mirroring the behavior you want from you negotiating partners, keeps the 80% rule on your side!

About the author: Steve Chriest is the founder of Selling UpTM (www.selling-up.com), a sales consulting firm specializing in sales improvement for organizations of all types and sizes in a variety of industries. He is also the author of Selling The E-Suite, The Proven System for Reaching and Selling Senior Executives and Five Minute Financial Analyst, Basic CREDIT & Analysis Tools for Non-Accountants. He was the CEO of a very successful leasing company and executive at a major company. You can reach Steve at schriest@selling-up.com.

 

Modern History of Leasing

Written by Tom McCurnin, Leasing News Legal Editor
and Christopher Menkin, Leasing News Editor
(Part Two of Four)

Brokers Grow in Leasing

 

As the brokers got into the field, many started their own leasingcompanies as originators and some brought in investors or obtain lines of credit via investors or relatives or putting up their house. Private label contracts used by funders for “captive vendor” business became the purview of independents who did the sales while the funder did the approvals and servicing.

At first it was recourse with the banks, then non-recourse as they taught bank officers how the procedure worked and banks become more comfortable. Companies also were obtaining recourse lines of credit from banks with leasing divisions such as Crocker Citizens, Security Pacific, Union Bank, Wells Fargo with its auto center division. Companies such as TRE Financial, Phoenix, Key Lease, and SHW Capital grew to compete with AT&T Capital, Dana, FMC, and Tri-Continental. GE was still the elephant in the room.

Larger banks at this time were getting into middle-market leasing, and for a long time, Bank of America did not consider any leasing below $500,000, even for good existing bank customers.

Leasing commission by leasing companies financed by banks were often capped at 2% to 3%, what the funders were also paying dealers or the dealer sales personnel direct. Copiers were the most popular to be leased, then telephones, security systems, office furniture, and finally computers and even software in the 1980’s. There was very little “franchise leasing,” even McDonald’s and “7- Eleven were financed, not leased— and Small Business Administration loans prohibited leasing until their loan was paid off. Brokers learned they could not only earn more of a commission in “discounting,” but could earn the residual when the lease paid out, as it was treated as a “balloon payment,” not counted in the “stream of payments.”

This was the start of independent brokers, and a group in California joined together and were up to over 80 members when the then Western Association of Equipment Lessors began to take brokers. In the group were A.J. Batt of Atel Capital, Louis Funkenstein (Funston) of Western States, Mont Gates of Leaserite, Jim Harris of Allco Leasing and Financial, Kit Menkin of American Leasing, Ted Parker of CCLease, just to name a few who began their own leasing companies. (5)

The former Equipment Leasing and Finance Association was slow in accepting third party originators, according to their directories, as well as their membership fees were higher. The newly formed Western Association of Equipment Lessors (WAEL) voted against allowing brokers being a member of their group. In reality, most of the members were “brokers with a staff” acting as a lessor. When it got to the point of competing for broker business, they were allowed to join so they could go to meetings and attract more brokers. Many of them kept direct sales staff, but augmented their business with an “indirect business” representative/processing staff. (6)

As the independent leasing companies grew, they began to have portfolios, warehouse lines to fund leases, and the syndication age began where companies would build up warehouse lines of leases and then discount them in dollar amounts, primarily over $1 million or more. As the marketplace changed, banks got involved and would start to accept portfolios and warehouse lines of credit. In the beginning, it was all recourse to the leasing company.

As competition grew, the 1980’s saw the growth of lessors with non-recourse and recourse lines of credit with large banks, then smaller regional banks, and even community banks as it become more acceptable. There were books and manuals published and with brokers joining associations, then other funders, including banks, also wanted to join to vie for their business. The trend was away from direct sales to independent brokers who had access to smaller vendors, manufacturers, distributors, too expensive for the larger companies to service. Fax machines sped up the business, as well as lower price leasing software was becoming available as computers were less expensive and could now not only do accounting, but contain contracts from various companies, which sped up the process. Sending applications, constructs, documents by Federal Express became very popular. Speed became very popular, more than “rate.” Software was catching up with Capital Stream, Lease Team, McCue, and others (even brokers now had software to speed up the typing and processing of documents.)

In 1990, a group of leasing brokers formed an association called the National Association of Equipment Leasing Brokers, where brokers were the only ones who could vote in a general election, as well as had a much lower fee than another group, such as funder or service provider. At first they had a part-time “secretary” and with the help primarily of two attorneys, Joe Bonanno and Barry Marks, Esq. grew into a premier organization which had 1,089 members.

With the roaring economy of the 1990’s, everyone became a leasing broker, including the dealers who were demanding higher and higher referral fees for their business. Franchise business was booming, and so was leasing of franchises as well as when they had an SBA loan as the covenant not to lease was changed. Second mortgage made subprime leasing with very high rates acceptable. The trend then turned to “automated credit scoring” and “application only” kept growing up to $150,000 for when once what was standard requirement were a financial statement, tax return, and personal financial statement requirement for small leases especially.

Computerized credit scoring became very popular, not only for marketing purposes, but for approving credit. Often a consumer credit report, time in business, and average bank account was all that was needed. Certain professions such as medical or dental, the limit on “app. only” was higher than others.

Colonial Pacific Leasing developed Pegasus a program for lessors who generated a specific volume and could use the credit scoring system, this may be likened to a franchise operation as the leasing company had a territory and franchise. First Sierra took this a step further by combining many independent lessors into one large company for the volume, making them “corporate partners” and companies such as Republic Leasing of South Carolina began syndicating leases with banks, mortgage companies and others who would underwrite the lease portfolio, enabling them to extend their lines of credit for more leases. (7)

In 1998 and 1999 companies were being merged into large groups, and this trend continued into a downturn in 2000 that saw many companies closed and Leasing News started its well-read “The List”, eventually labeling the list of companies closed as being hit by “The Perfect Storm” after a movie came out starring George Clooney who takes his boat out into weather that the ship no longer can ride. (8)

As the companies merged or went out of business, they rose up again as independents, small lessors who were basically brokers, but instead of using company documents, the thrust was “originators,” who began to act as if they were a “funder” as the contracts were theirs, and often the check emanated from them as that was the discounting arrangement with the actual funding source. First Sierra and Colonial grew at terrific rates during this short time period. General Electric was buying leasing companies left and right.

Some of the originators had warehouse lines to fund the leases and then when all the parts were in place, or a group, they were then packaged and discounted. Computers made it simpler. Summit, Lease Team, among others came up with affordable software packages. Companies such as Pioneer Capital gave brokers not only internet access, but software to type and fund documents very simply. (9)

It was the “Age of the Broker” who often was making 15 points on a transaction. Several, such as Balboa Capital, would pay up to 20%, discounting some of the profit in advance from the residual or Evergreen Lease clause. (10)

As of 2005 the National Association of Equipment Brokers (NAELB) had grown to 648 members, where the now Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA) who had 850 members in 2000 was down to 780 members, and the United Association of Equipment Lessors who was at 589 members in the year 2000 was down to 297 members. It was a “no holds bar the door” and get the deal funded as quickly as you could, “due diligence” out the window, and the race was on who could bring in the most business and earn the most in commissions—take the money and run. Everyone wanted to be an independent broker and earn the generous commissions.

Friday—Part Three of Four
“Hits the Fan”

(5) http://www.leasingnews.org/list_alpha_new.htm#allco

(6) http://www.leasingnews.org/Conscious-Top%20Stories/WAEL_Hist_I.htm

(7) http://www.leasingnews.org/Conscious-Top%20Stories/CLP.htm

(8) http://two.leasingnews.org/archives/November/11-29-00.htm

(9) http://www.leasingnews.org/archives/April%202008/04-02-08.htm#adv
http://two.leasingnews.org/archives/November%202001/11-09-01.htm

(10) http://two.leasingnews.org/archives/May01/5-29-01.htm
http://www.leasingnews.org/archives/September%202004/9-21-04.htm#sales
http://www.leasingnews.org/Conscious-Top%20Stories/Salesman_Survey_update.htm
http://www.leasingnews.org/archives/October%202006/10-18-06.htm#points

Bulletin Board Complaint

Bulletin Board Complaint

(Looking for response from readers on
whether leasing company 
should be named.)

Leasing News would like readers to respond whether the company not named in this complaint should be named. This complaint is considered “open.” The back-up data is not included as well as some information is “disguised” in order to disguise names.

XYZ was looking for a “finance lease” of $150,000, primarily software delivered by wire, and decided not to use their bank lines, which were quite available. The two best bids came from East Coast and West Coast lessors. They chose the West Coast 36 month .304 rate. Most of the installation started in March, 2010, almost three months in advance with XYZ making payments to the vendor, accepting the software well before the signing of the lease. $115,000 remaining was remaining not paid and included in a June 22, 2010 contract, now a 12 quarter payment lease at a .063886 factor as the salesman had convinced it was a better deal, requiring $9,582.90 with the face of the contract which stated it would be applied to the “Last Quarterly Rental.” There also was a documentation fee of $1,050.00.

The quarterly payment also said “Plus sales/use tax if applicable.”

West Coast then required what was assumed the first payment on July 14, 2010 and after conversations, was paid on July 30, 2010. The vendor was paid on July 13th by wire, the vendor states.

There were ten payments made to the bank starting on September 13, 2010. When the bank requested the last payment, XYZ said to apply the security deposit as per the contract. And in looking at this, wondered why the bank was charging use tax on the payment, not noticed until the documents were reviewed by him. There also was a $495 termination fee from their earlier notification they were exercising the $101 purchase option (termination fee not in the lease contract.)

In speaking with the Bank, West Coast had assigned 11 payments, counting the security deposit as perhaps the first payment. As to what XYZ considered the first payment, it was never received by the Bank (the bank states) and appears West Coast treated as “interim rent” and kept the amount. XYZ had decided not to send in payment number 11 to the Bank as they had signed a contract where the security deposit was to be applied for this purpose.

Leasing News was contacted and while West Coast never returned a telephone call or many emails, Leasing News spoke with the Bank, and explained the contract was with XYZ, who kept the 12th payment and did not apply the “first payment” but treated it as profit.

At last conversation, it appears half of the “interim rent” which XYZ thought was to be returned (not confirmed). It is believed the 11th payment was sent to the bank, who also told Leasing News would waive the late fee under the circumstances.

The issue of the use tax on software and maintenance by wire is not resolved, and it is unknown if the $495.00 termination fee not appearing in the lease contract was waived by West Coast.

Leasing News would like to hear opinions on this from readers.

You may opt-out of being named in your opinion, although it is preferred that you do and state it is your personal opinion and not your company’s. Please click here(kitmenkin@leasingnews.org). Thank you.

MB Taylor Cole Merger

Good for Leasing Industry

MB Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: MBFI), the holding company for MB Financial Bank, N.A., on Monday announced 2013 second quarter net income of $25.3 million. A joint press release also announced MB Financial Taylor Capital Group, Inc. (“Taylor Capital”) (NASDAQ: TAYC) announced the signing of a definitive merger agreement whereby MB Financial will acquire Taylor Capital. Taylor Capital is the holding company of Cole Taylor Bank, a commercial bank headquartered in Chicago with $5.9 billion in assets, $3.3 billion in loans and $3.7 billion in deposits as of June 30, 2013. MB Financial is the $9.4 billion Chicago-based holding company of MB Financial Bank, N.A.

It was noted that the MB Financial increase was driven by the addition of Celtic Leasing Corp. (“Celtic”), a recently acquired leasing subsidiary, which contributed $13 million in leasing revenues during the first six months of 2013. Excluding Celtic, leasing revenues increased 28% in the first six months of 2013 compared to the first six months of 2012.
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11977441/1/mb-financial-inc-reports-second-quarter-net-income-of-253-million-and-return-on-assets-of-109.html

Ed Dahlka
President
Cole Taylor Equipment Finance

Cole Taylor bank got into equipment finance with a team lead by Edward A. Dahlka, Jr., former president and founder of LaSalle National Leasing (now part of Bank of America Leasing). He had been building his team, opening offices throughout the United States with new people, as evidenced in Leasing News “New Hires-Promotions” David M. Drury has joined the company as group senior vice president of sales and capital markets. In this role, Drury will report to CTEF president, Edward A. Dahlka, Jr.

Jill York, CFO
MB Financial

Jill York, CFO, MB Financial told Leasing News it will be “Business as usual. Ed is doing a great job with this business and focuses on a different segment than MB’s lease banking group and leasing subsidiaries. Ed does large ticket, while Celtic and LaSalle do mid ticket. All originate direct.”

A conference telephone call after the announcement found wide acceptance from the press as the thinking was the strategically attractive combination is expected to nearly double MB Financial’s middle market commercial banking market share in the Chicago area. Reportedly, Taylor Capital’s nine branches complement MB Financial’s existing network of 85 Chicago-area branches. The combined bank is expected to have a top-10 deposit market share ranking in the Chicago MSA and top-5 deposit market share ranking in Cook County.

Mitchell Feiger
President, CEO
MB Financial

“The merger of Taylor Capital and MB Financial is a terrific strategic transaction. Each side brings a strong middle market commercial banking business as well as significant national niche businesses,” stated Mitchell Feiger, President and Chief Executive Officer of MB Financial.

The Chicago Tribune noted in its first sentence: “MB Financial Bank plans to close three to six branches in the Chicago area as part of its newly proposed $680 million purchase of the parent of Cole Taylor Bank,” as well as “,,,That will also mean the end a company that has been overseen by three generations of the Taylor family.”

Feiger will remain CEO of the combined parent company. Taylor Capital CEO Mark Hoppe will become CEO of MB Financial’s subsidiary bank, MB Financial Bank.

The Chicago Tribune noted that Mitchell Feiger said “he has known Hoppe for 30 years. Upon completion of the merger, Jennifer Stearns and C. Bryan Daniels from Taylor Capital’s board of directors will join the MB Financial board.

“Feiger said on the call that he also looks forward to working with Bruce Taylor, chairman and a board member of Taylor Capital.(overseen by three generations of the Taylor family.), (however)… Taylor isn’t named as a director of the merged company. The Taylor family owns about 30 percent of the company, with the Steans family, who invested in the bank a few years ago and were instrumental in installing Hoppe, owning about 14 percent, the latest proxy statement shows.”

Mark A. Hoppe
President/CEO
Cole Taylor Bank

“Hoppe is a former LaSalle Bank lender who left that institution after Bank of America bought it. Cole Taylor and other local banks have grown amid the shakeout of Bank of America’s purchase of LaSalle.”
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-mb-financial-taylor-capital-20130715,0,318500.story

It was Hoppe who convinced Ed Dahlka to form a new equipment finance division in Towson, Maryland.
http://leasingnews.org/archives/Jul2012/7_16.htm#cole_taylor

Taylor Capital President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Hoppe will become President and Chief Executive Officer of MB Financial’s subsidiary bank, MB Financial Bank. Upon completion of the merger, Jennifer W. Steans and C. Bryan Daniels from Taylor Capital’s board of directors will join the MB Financial board. The definitive agreement was unanimously approved by the boards of directors of MB Financial and Taylor Capital.

The merger is subject to regulatory approvals, approval by MB Financial stockholders, approval by Taylor Capital stockholders and certain other customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the first half of 2014. The merger is expected to be immediately accretive to MB Financial’s annual GAAP and cash EPS.